Reform Versus Revolution

It has always seemed that there's been a conflictmake it a social issue. The tactic of bambing
between reformers and revolutionaries. The formerStarbucks, for example, might only have a monetary
relatively being described as those who want todamage on a corporation that uses foreign slave
patch up and repair the parts of the current systemlabor for coffee beans, maybe $20,000 or $30,000.
that cause so much misery. The latter relatively beingFrom the stand point of the urban guerilla, that is the
described as those who want to completely overturnpoint of the activity. But, this bombing puts corporate
the social system in favor of a different system, onepractices of Starbucks in to the spotlight of society.
much more applicable to the wants and desires ofPeople will be forced to look at it and deal with it as
human society. The chief aim of both has been thus:an issue. A single bombing might very well have a
to change the current order of society insomuch thatgreater spread of ideas and beliefs than a ten
the lives of people (and animals, perhaps) arethousand printed and distributed pamphlets.
considerably improved. Both the reformer and theEssentially, these urban guerillas would be satisfying
revolutionary are motivated by the same cause; theythe philosophy of Martin Luther King: by making an
are plants to the same fertilizer. Their aim is toissue of the matter, people must recognize it and
improve the lot of mankind -- to change those faultsdeal with it. King accomplished his goal by marching in
which have become inherent parts of life.One of thethe streets, being ripped to shreds by attack dogs of
most common assaults made against the reformerthe police, beating beaten by cops in riot gear.So, the
by the revolutionary is this: by reforming the system,first purpose of urban guerillas is economic damage.
by making small changes, my patching up small partsFor preventing the corporate entity from gaining
of the system, we are doing nothing but making theprofits, that means the entire social structure breaks
system more livable, making the people moredown. That means that no money will be funnelled to
tolerant of the status quo. For example, during theVietnamese sweatshops so that children work 12
French Revolution, the efforts of all reformers (ifhours a day. That means no bribes are going to be
there were any) were completely ineffective. Nothingmade to the shifty governments of third world
was patched up. Nothing was changed. Thecountrties. In an international Capitalist society where
commonplace misery of the greater 95% of themoney is power, by inflicting economic damage on
population, caused by the social relationships, wasthese creatures of doomsday, we are eliminating
enough to motivate the mass of people to revolttheir power, their strength. That is to say, we are
and overthrow their government. It was their misery,hindering their ability to exploit the citizens and
their pain, the suffering they had endured, that madeworkers of all countries. And, beyond that, to act as
them in to revolutionaries. Reformers, thea current and standing threat to the corporations, to
revolutionary intellectual argues, prevent that miserystand as the defender of internationally understood
from existing, and thus, they prevent revolutionaryrights of the people. Corporate entities will be much
tendencies from taking place. For example, reformersmore hesitant to engage in activities that bring with
in the United States have created a Minimum Wagethem a constant barrage of bombings, property
law, have sustained fair working conditions indefacement, etc., etc..The second purpose, and
manufacturing plants, have created unemploymentperhaps the often unintended purpose, of
payments, have erected numerous public worksrevolutionary activity is to bring the issue to the
programs -- all things that have alleviated the miseriesspotlight, to make society look at these guerillas and
of the working class in the United States. If none ofunderstand their reasons. Sure, the great deal of
these things had been put in to place, if none ofconservative, right-wingers will argue that these men
these reforms were given acceptance by theare deviants of the social order, an unintended
government, then the working class would be prettyconsequence, probably spawned by mental illness and
pissed off -- they would become revolutionaries fromthe inability to adaptate to society's wants. The
the 16 to 20 hour working days, the repression ofsame was said of Martin Luther King, of the
the will of the workers, the massive amounts ofCommunists and the Socialists and the Anarchists, of
poverty and unemployment, etc., etc.. If theall people who wanted to improve society and make
conditions in the United States were worsened, thenthe lives of all much easier. In fact, sometimes this
working proletariat would be so moved as to revoltsecond purpose is the primary purpose. There are
against the class system, and they would create amany Animal Liberation Front/A.L.F. cells (known as
genuinely Libertarian Communist social order.At least,"terrorist organizations" to the government) which
that is the argument presented by those peoplebreak in to testing laboratories with video cameras.
wearing the title "Revolutionary." I think an exampleMany of them obtain video tapes from the testing
or two is sufficient to prove them wrong. Considerfacility. These tapes are then mailed to the major
again, the French Revolution. The misery and povertynews media outlets, and they are often played on
of the working class instigated them to overthrowingnational television; the public then is made aware of
the ruling class. However, what was the result? Didthe cruelty that is inherent in animal testing and
they erect this genuniely Libertarian,experimentation. Lewis Heine, the photographer of
Anarcho-Communist-Syndicalist social order? Did theythe early 1900's, was capable of sneaking in to many
create a society free of censorship, free offactories and manufacturing plants, disguised as an
repression, free of sexism, free of racism, free ofofficial of the census bureau; upon gaining access, he
exploitive social relationships? No, they did not. Whatwould photograph the children laboring in machines,
was enacted was the Jacobin philosophy, that of amany of them physically deformed by the
Federated Republican government. That is to say,environment that they were working in. It was these
what they created upon the eve of revolution, wasphotos that greatly aided the elimination of child labor
a system of government that the reformers hadfrom the United States and all European countries.
been aiming to create. If we took away the(I'm quite curious as to why the government hasn't
hard-earned rights that labor has earned in the Unitedever labelled this man as a terrorist, despite the fact
States (minimum wage, overtime pay, etc.), if wethat his tactics are nearly identical to those of the
took all of those away, and a revolution were toA.L.F..) It was through the use of these tactics that
take place because fo that, I think it's pretty obviousthe goals of these revolutionaries were accomplished,
what kind of government the revolutionaries wouldby forcing the public to acknowledge the issue.So,
set up. They would create a government that wasn'tthen, in conclusion, what is the greatest way to
much different than the previous one, the primaryadvance the political ideology that you hold dear?
differences being a fair minimum wage law, overtimeWhat way is most effective in advancing Animal
pay, non-hazardous work conditions, etc., etc..I thinkLiberation, in destroying the Corporate State, in
the essential message here is that revolution aloneestablishing an Anarcho-Syndicalist Federation? Is it
does convince people of the arguments ofreform, that is to say, the peaceful and lawful
Anarchism, Socialism, Communism, etc., etc.. That ischanging of opinions, through pamphleteering,
to say, the arguments of those who want todistribution of propaganda, etc., etc.? Or, is it
radically reorganize society so that human misery andrevolution, that is to say, breaking the law as a
want nearly disappear completely. That does notmeans and method to accomplishing your goal? In
mean that revolution itself is a completely uselessthe past, both tactics have managed to gain ground,
tool, without any relation to the class struggles thatto accomplish their goals. Harriet Tubman, Frederick
take place everyday in modern society. In fact, whatDouglass, Martin Luther King, John Brown, every
use is revolutionary activity? Does it have anyperson who served in the revolutionary forces to
valuable, useful aspects to it? I suppose I am of theaccomplish and sustain the civil rights of all people --
opinion, "No Peace Without Justice." I cannot seethe term terrorist that is applied to A.L.F. and
justice, in a people laying down, to make it easier forAnarcho-Syndicalist cells equally applies to these
their oppressors to steal their labor and destroy theirpeople. In some of the cases, their tactics were
culture. Not only is such an idea devoid of justice, butsuccesful in making the enemy weaker, so that the
it is equally devoid of sense and common reasoning.deathblow would be much more succinct and easy.
Let's take some examples... The French Resistance toThe reformers, of which we can count Henry
the Nazi invasion of France; did these undergroundStephens Salt, Percy Bysshe Shelley, Robert Green
revolutionaries ("terrorists") help to better serve theirIngersoll, among so many countless other names,
purpose? Were they wrong for secretly buildingwere successful in some efforts and unsuccessful in
bombs to be used in destroying fortifications of theothers. To which road should we take? It is clear
Third Reich? I don't think of any person wouldthat I have taken the road of the reformer, to
disagree to this argument, excepting maybeconvince the minds of men and women of alternative
Gandhi.Consider a more modern argument. Considertheories of social order, that a collective effort can
American and European revolutionaries today, "urbanbe willed into existence, to change our living
guerillas," etc., etc.. It was an Anarchist who shotconditions. Whether a person decides to take the
President McKinley on his inauguration day, becauseroad I have, or the road of the revolutionary, I do
of McKinley's invasion Cuba and other islands in thenot think anything should be held against a person for
area. It was the Anarchist Alexander Berkman whotheir decision, unless it is clear that their actions
assasinated Frick, a Capitalist whose idea ofsimply inhibit the achieving of our goals. Life,Punkerslut
"humaneness" was working in dangerous conditions(or Andy Carloff) has been writing essays and poetry
for low and unfair pay. But then again, the wayon social issues which have caught his attention for
governments and corporations respond to suchseveral years. His website provides a complete list of
industrial sabotage and warfare, is usually with aall of these writings. His life experience includes
repression of civil liberties. It does not make thehomelessness, squating in New Orleans and LA,
enemy more sympathetic to the cause of thesedropping out of high school, getting expelled from
radicals. At least, not necessarily. There is a goodcollege for "subversive activities," and a myriad of
chance that the activities of bombing McDonald's andother revolutionary actions.
burning down Starbucks will catch the public eye, and