Why Investing in Property is Better Than Stocks and Shares

Debating the pros and cons of investing in stocksThe power of Leverage can be seen in this simple
and shares versus investing in property is a popularexample:
subject amongst analysts, brokers and investors. ThisIn order to buy £100,000 worth of shares you
debate is often conducted under the guise ofneed £100,000 in cash, but to be able to buy
comparing traditional pensions versus propertya £100,000 property you would typically need
investment, as most traditional pensions are invested£20,000 because you are able borrow the
in global stock markets. Stock market analysts willrest from a bank. Banks are happy to secure the
often accept that property is the better investment£80,000 loan against the property being
in a given year compared to stocks and shares.purchased, safe in the knowledge that people will
However they will often fail to take into accountalways need somewhere to live ensuring that
some of the major advantages that propertydemand for the property, and long term price rises,
investment has over stocks and shares whenwill almost certainly guarantee the safety of their loan
declaring that stocks and shares have out performedin the event of default.
property in another year.After a property is purchased and a mortgage is put
For example, a stock market analyst might attemptin place you are then able to rent the property out
to promote investments in stocks and shares byto service the cost of the loan and other expenses
stating something like this:and in many cases provide extra profit.
"Last year average property prices increased 7% andUsing the above example we can examine the ROCE
the stock market was up 10% so stocks and sharesin 2 scenarios, one in a year where percentage gains
performed better and represent a betterwere higher in property and another in a year in
investment."which percentage returns were higher in shares.
While the facts as stated, in terms of percentageYear 1
gains, are entirely true, to claim that this automaticallyCapital Invested in Stocks & Shares =
makes stocks and shares a better investment is£20,000
very misleading. It is understandable that, after givingCapital Invested in Property = £20,000
such figures a cursory glance, you would believe thatAsset Value at Start of Year Stocks & Shares
in the 'last year' you should have been investing in= £20,000
stocks and shares. Indeed that is exactly theAsset Value at Start of Year Property =
conclusion the analyst might want you to reach.£100,000
Gearing and the Return on Capital Employed% Increase in Value during Year in Stocks and
The Return On Capital Employed (ROCE) fromShares = 7%
property in this case will have easily been far higher.% Increase in Value during Year in Property = 10%
Why? Because you can borrow money from a bankProfit in Stocks & Shares = £1,400
or other lending institution to buy property andProfit in Property = £10,000
secure the loan against the property that is beingYear 2
purchased. This means that you only need to investCapital Invested in Stocks & Shares =
the amount of your own money required to pay the£20,000
deposit on the purchase rather than the full price ofCapital Invested in Property = £20,000
the property. This is often referred to as Gearing orAsset Value at Start of Year Stocks & Shares
Leverage and it is not something that can easily be= £20,000
achieved when investing in shares.Asset Value at Start of Year Property =
Banks will generally not accept shares as security£100,000
since they are considered highly volatile.Not only can% Increase in Value during Year in Stocks and
they go down in value as well as up but, they can inShares = 10%
certain instances lose almost all their value in a very% Increase in Value during Year in Property = 7%
short space of time. Companies can quickly hit hugeProfit in Stocks & Shares = £2,000
difficulties due to factors such as poor management,Profit in Property = £7,000
strong competition and unfavourable marketAs you would expect property provides the better
conditions. For example, shares in the HBOS groupreturn in year 1 when property prices rose higher
were trading at around £12 each before thethan share prices - delivering a massive 50% ROCE
credit crunch hit Britain, only to fall to be values atwith just at 10% rise in prices. However, due to the
just a few pence during the height of the crisis. Suchpower of gearing, property also provides a far
volatility simply does not occur in property markets.superior return to stocks and shares (2.5 to1) in year
Despite all the media talk of a crash of epic and2 when share prices rose higher than property prices.
unprecedented proportions in the UK propertyAs you can see, the Return on Capital Employed
market between 2007 and 2009, the average house(ROCE) is a far better inidicator of profitablity than
price decline amounted to around 15% at its worse.the headline percentage return for an asset class.