Good Stock Market Tip; Good Return!

>shares.
Forget making a profit; instead focus on the incomeTotal Amount of shares at the end of 2000: 463.82
provided from your stock portfolio. That’sshares.
right! Forget making a profit. The burden is now liftedTotal Amount of shares at the end of 2001: 474.47
- no more pressure on making a buck in the stockshares.
market. (Instead of trying to bend the spoon, that isTotal Amount of shares at the end of 2002: 490.23
impossible, instead just think of the spoon asshares.
— omigosh! - I’m in the Matrix!) WhenTotal Amount of shares at the end of 2003: 512.60
you focus on the amount of money your holdingsshares.
are providing in dividends — and when thoseTotal Amount of shares as of April 1, 2004: 522.23
companies selected have a history of raising theirshares.
dividends each year — a lower stock priceOn April 1, 2004 Comerica closed at $54.65, for the
allows the dividends that are being rolled back intototal market value of $28,539.87 for 522.23 shares of
the stock to accelerate your income. The total valuestock. To put the total $28,539.87 into perspective,
of your portfolio may go lower, but your incomean interest rate of 15 percent a year on $3,333.34,
from that lower priced portfolio would increasecompounded annually for fourteen and a quarter
dramatically. Profit by income!years would return $28,282.15.
To demonstrate this tip, I’m going to takeSince this excerpt from my book Comerica has
you back in time, but the strategy of that time israised their dividend again, from 52 cents a share per
just as viable today, as it was in the past. The yearquarter, to the current 55 cents a share per quarter,
is 1990, the stock for the demonstration is Comerica,payable to shareholders of record on March 15, 2005.
and the amount of money invested was $3,333.34.I own Comerica stock and I have no intention of
Comerica (CMA) was selected for one simple reasonever taking a profit! I will continue being a buyer, as
— in 1990 CMA had a historical record oflong as the company continues its program of raising
raising their dividend for the past 21 years.their dividend every year.
Today’s CMA has a 36 year history of raisingHowever, I also understand that in the stock market
their dividend every year.there are no guarantees! It is for this reason and this
In January 1990 Comerica was selling at $48.38 areason alone, that diversity is a necessity. If I knew
share, paid a quarterly dividend of 65 cents a share,for certain that CMA would continue its program of
with a dividend yield of 5.37% (.65 divided by 48.38 xraising their dividend every year, and that the next
4 x 100 = 5.37%). The result of just holding this14 years would provide better than 15 percent return
stock through the years, never taking a profit, andon my money, I would only own CMA stock. It is
simply having the dividends reinvested each quarterbecause of this ‘risk of no guarantees’ in
(commission-free) back into the stock is chronicledthe stock market that the rewards for investing in
below: These are the actual returns based on thethe stock market are much higher than a passbook
closing prices of the stock on the company’ssavings account, CD’s or Bonds.
dividend payout date (the date a company purchasesSo, to beat the ‘risk of no guarantees’,
their stock on the open market for investors enrolledand to reap the benefits of a better return, I
in their stock dividend reinvestment plan; The figuresdiversify into other companies with the same
were taken from the research I did, and is from anhistorical performance. Through a systematic
excerpt from my book The Stockopoly Planapproach of dollar-cost averaging into my stock
— Investing for Retirement.)positions every quarter, along with my quarterly
Comerica: (with the dividend each quarter rolled backdividend reinvestment, I increase the amount of
into the stock) $3,333.34 into CMA in January, 1990dividends paid to me each quarter, from every
at $48.38 a share: Shares purchased, 68.90 shares.company that I own. My measurement for success in
Total Amount of shares at the end of 1990: 72.92the stock market is not measured by the amount
shares.my portfolio is worth. It is measured by the amount
Total Amount of shares at the end of 1991: 115.01of ever-increasing cash dividends received from
shares.every stock that I own. As a matter of fact, when
Total Amount of shares at the end of 1992: 118.85my portfolio dips in net-worth, my dividend income
shares.accelerates. The reason for this is simple. The lower
Total Amount of shares at the end of 1993: 245.78my port- folio’s net-worth, the higher the
shares.dividend yields of the stocks in my portfolio.
Total Amount of shares at the end of 1994: 256.96All my personal holdings in the stock market have the
shares.same basic theme. They are all purchased
Total Amount of shares at the end of 1995: 268.78commission-free, have a long-term history of raising
shares.their dividend every year, and are purchased with the
Total Amount of shares at the end of 1996: 277.83intent of supplying ever-increasing dividend income
shares.for my retirement years. The Stockopoly Plan was
Total Amount of shares at the end of 1997: 285.32written with this purpose or goal in mind. The Plan
shares.itself uses a timing approach for purchases of more
Total Amount of shares at the end of 1998: 436.65shares each quarter, along with the dividend
shares.reinvestments.
Total Amount of shares at the end of 1999: 446.04