Are Business And Personal Account Holders Facing Unfair Banking Charges?

Banking charges are now integral to our business andagreement and not penalties for breach of a
personal accounts; recently however the bankingcontract, the banking industry cannot be held
industry has been facing court cases on the fairnessaccountable, and subsequently should not have to
of some bank charges.refund charges.
There are many in the business world that believeThe decision will affect personal account holders
the banking charges put in place by many banks aremore so than those with business accounts. The
unrepresentative and therefore should be scrapped.outcome of the ongoing investigation is set to
One argument has highlighted the overdraft as vitalrevolutionise the current account market within the
to many people's personal and business bankingUK; both sides, the Banking industry and the OFT are
needs and to charge unfairly for it is not just immoralstanding firm on their positions and hence the hearing
but bordering upon illegal.is likely to go on for some time.
A High Court hearing is looking into allegations thatIt has originally been scheduled to last for eight days
the banking industry is acting illegally and has come tobut this figure is wholly unrealistic. The huge volume
the conclusion that providing customers with creditof evidence will delay the case further, while a
was a substantial element to business and personaldecision is expected around Easter time the appeal
account services.process is likely to continue for at least another year.
The whole debit and cheque cashing business wouldSome personal and account holders have actually
come to a halt without account credit and hence thebeen recorded as saying that they are actually
consumer economy would suffer greatly. The bankscontented with the current system of charges. Only
argue that if they did not honour customer debitbeing charged for being in the red is seen by many
payments and then charge accordingly, purchasingas ideal; overdraft charges can be viewed as
would take a backward step to hard currencypayment for an entire collection of services provided
payments once again.by the banking industry not as penalties for entering
This is the fundamental argument of the bankingthe red.
industry; they believe these credit charges areThis can however be seen as a bi-polar argument as
perfectly legal as they are classified as banking feesthere will always be a split of account holders in
rather than penalties. It may seem an argumentcredit and in their overdrafts. For those in credit,
based purely upon the different use of language, butpaying fees for going overdrawn is not an issue
when lawyers are concerned arguing vocabularywhereas those who are constantly on the
differences may make or break a case.subsistence level will see overdraft charges as unfair.
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has waded into theDepending upon which argument the High court
case and demanded that business and personaldecides to follow will have major repercussions. If the
account charges be reigned in, the High CourtOFT's argument is upheld the banking industry will be
however has come to another conclusion.forced to refund billions of pounds worth of penalty
The High Court has concluded that the arguments oncharges. This may seem a positive for consumers but
both sides depend upon one factor. This factor is thethis outcome is unlikely to be of financial gain for
contract signed when opening a business or personalaccount holders. If banks are forced to repay
account. The High Court has stated that as long ascharges it will surely result in increased contractual
the payments are for services within the contractualcharges and the end of free banking services.